Authorship in media writing

Media has the ability to make life more real.  The user of media, whether creating or reading what others have created, engages in a relationship with others.  This can be in a variety of ways, from internet use, cell phones, television, radio and text.  The common denominator is all information shared  has an author and at times, depending on the format a multitude of authors.  This shift in the ownership of a created piece of work that becomes accessible to others on a worldwide level is what makes life and media work hand in hand.

                Information accessed on the Internet is often intentionally (or unintentionally) tied to clickable links, allowing the consumer to instantly gather possibly more information than ever intended.  All information, though it may seem to just linger out there, unclaimed by any single person, is traceable back to it point of origin.  Manovich wrote that new media created new models of authorship which involve multiple forms of collaboration in order to present a finished product.  This seemed to imply that very little circulating on the Internet is original work.  From one aspect, that is true.  The work has been changed here and there, in virtual reality, but still, one person had to have set this into motion.  The remixing, sampling and open source projects all started somewhere, but have been art of some type mashed together with other art.  This probably started with the Dada’s and their desire to shake-up people’s view on how art is created.  The Dada’s concept of “found objects” recycled into a new art is an easy parallel to what remixing and sampling are in the humanities of the 21st Century.

                Diakopoulos’s graphs in the Remix Culture paper depicted the original “book” type of authorship represented as person to media to person, ie: writer makes literary work and it is read by a consumer.  I understand his four figures shown in the reading, but I think there is one more that could be represented.  Sharing on the Internet means a literary work has been produced and released worldwide.  Again, I envision this as a ray, in a scientific aspect.  The writer creates a starting point and shares it with millions of people at once.  Those reading this static work (written, photo or video) and shares it on their chosen media outlet (Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Google+, etc.) and it just keeps expanding exponentially with no end.  The author will always remain the author.  Ideally, no one should be making changes to a piece of work that is not intended to be part of an open source or remix process. 

I find the art of remixing, sampling and meme extremely enjoyable.  Photoshop and Microsoft Video have made this simple to do.  The process of making these sampled works often involves using what others have already created.  I do this sampling to learn the writing process, especially that of classic rhetors.  I even practice speaking in a rhetorical manner and find that it does affect those I am addressing.  Language and everything associated with language can be used in current times to create works that will cause a reaction or evoke an emotion.  After Miley Cyrus danced on stage with a foam finger, twerking at the music awards, I created a meme of her and Thicke onstage with Thicke’s head removed and Beetlejuice’s head replaced.  In quotes, I wrote “Oh Miley, you’re my #1 too!”  Yes, the photo was taken from the MTV website, but the idea and meme creation stemming from the frame frozen in the video, was mine.  To make this claim, I simply added Girlboxer1970.com to the photo-shopped picture.  To my audience, they realize I didn’t take the photo, I just put my “twist” on the entire performance that honestly disgusted me, yet like a train-wreck, I couldn’t look away.  That is how I want consumers to view my writing, photography and videos.  I’m fine with being a train-wreck as long as my audience continues to return and I don’t get charged for altering Thicke’s head into Beetlejuice.

8 Hours of Media

Nutella

Pattie Crider

WRT 320 Digital Writing

Digital Literacy Narrative

September 5, 2013

8 Hours of Media

 

            What I can clearly see, after documenting specific use of technology is: my life would not be the same without it.  Technology is the vehicle that drives humans. Unless you live in a secluded, undeveloped area of the world, technology has an impact on nearly every moment of the day.

I began using media thirty minutes after waking and used it, nearly continuously, until retiring for the day. In the eight hours I logged, I found it most interesting that my media time frame began with me trying to reach my child and ended with her reaching me, as I left my final class.  I could not live life without personal access to others via my cell phone and the Internet.  I am not alone in this thought. Most of the world could not function as we know it, without the technology humans have created.

I consumed information digitally on my cell phone and laptop through-out the day for classroom information, personal research and interaction with friends and associates. I produced information and shared it worldwide on the Internet and also participated in personal messages by cell phone and computer. While driving to and from campus, I “collected” digital images with the intent of sharing them in the future on the Internet for the enjoyment and education of others. My life is nearly constant in the media in the aspect that I freely share my life with others on my blog site, Twitter, Facebook and other social media outlets. My life and approximate whereabouts is available 24 hours a day, 356 days, a year at the touch of any Internet capable device.

Media has become the “auto drive” of my life. I react and use it, without giving thought to losing this technology. I am driven to interact with people all over the world. This sounds rather grand of me, but I am just a speck on the earth that has managed to gain the attention of many other specks populating the earth.  Without having media technology, much of the world would not know of my existence, possibly influencing my career path. My perspective differs from most others. I intentionally “put myself out there” for all to examine and draw their own conclusions. As a writer, this style humanizes me, making others able to relate to me personally and professionally. That “reader to writer” relationship maintains them as dedicated consumers of my daily, never-ending online diary.

 

Reference: media use log

8 AM Phone call to Tesla- redirected to voice mail.

8:10 Received call from Dale

8:15 Pocket dialed my dentist

8:16 Phone call to Tesla- redirected to voice mail.

8:17 Online: Checked YCP email, Yahoo email, Facebook, Girlboxer1970, Twitter and played Candy (Crack) Crush.

9:30 Texting a friend from high school on my phone

9:35 Took pictures with my digital camera on the way to campus to later post on the “You know you’re from York when,” Facebook Page.

10 AM Watched an episode of the television show Bones through Netflicks in Professor Waddel’s Interdisciplinary Writing course.  Used my cell phone to create enough light to take notes.

10:57 Checked Facebook and text messages.

11:07 Received a text message from another friend from high school.  She would be stopping by my house to drop off clothes for my daughter.  Woot!!

11:30 Internet use in Professsor Carsey’s Rhetorical Theory class.  Viewed a German Sheppard for adoption and applied Pathos to make an argument for why “we should adopt a shelter dog.”

12:05 PM Took digital photos of the campus in order to create a Spartan article and blog post about the changes on campus.

12:30 Online: Checked YCP email, Yahoo email, Facebook, Girlboxer1970, Twitter and played Candy (Crack) Crush.

1:15 Responded to text about clothes being dropped off at my home.

2:30 Checked YCP website to see what room my Geography class was held.

4:02 Received a return phone call from my daughter.

ENDNOTE: At least I’m not hooked on Farmville anymore!

~P.

%d bloggers like this: